Back to Top

Annual Research Digest

Evidence-based policy has become somewhat of a catchphrase in politics. Everybody's for it and nobody's against it. But there's evidence and there's evidence. Education policy has long been guided by research with poor quality, which in turn has contributed to the confusion regarding what works and what doesn't work in education. Anybody can find a study proving their point. But not everyone can find good studies that prove their point.

Since December 2015, we have published an Annual Research Digest. The 2015 Annual Research Digest, included contributions from a number of influential researchers considering important pieces of research they think should be acknowledged and discussed in education policy circles. The 2016-17 Annual Digest, considering recent evidence on uses of technology in education, was published on 6th July 2017.

We also publish an (almost) Monthly Research Digest, intended to give interested parties a regular view of what the rigorous economic research suggests works in education, both from a macro-policy perspective as well as from the point of view of teachers and head teachers who are looking for more effective classroom strategies. The digest provides abstracts and snippets of such research, with comment and analysis of selected studies that are especially interesting from the point of view of educators and policymakers. You can find the Monthly Research Digests here.


 

 

Annual Digest 2016-17: Evidence on uses of technology in education

A substantial amount of money is spent on technology by schools, families and policymakers with the hope of improving educational outcomes. However, the results of these initiatives have been mixed. As often as not, the introduction of technology into classrooms has failed to achieve the grand expectations proponents anticipated. Indeed, stories and studies abound about how specific student populations were unable to benefit from particular innovations that feature the use of technology for teaching and learning. Meanwhile many technology companies have expanded their product ranges in education well beyond their understanding of these applications’ efficacy.

In this, CfEE’s second Annual Research Digest, leading researchers and thinkers consider solid pieces of research published over the past academic year on the uses of technology in education, with important implications for policy and practice – research they think should be more widely discussed.

While it is clear that technology is no panacea in education, the papers discussed indicate that it may play an important role if it is implemented well and for the right purposes. It is up to future research to analyse more precisely in what ways technology could be a boon in the educational process – and 

which strategies and applications may undermine it. 

Download a free .pdf copy of the Annual Digest here.

Contributions to the volume include commentary on the following research papers:

1. ‘Computers and Productivity: Evidence from Laptop Use in the College Classroom’ (Richard W. Patterson, Robert M. Patterson) by: John Blake

2. ‘Disrupting Education? Experimental Evidence on Technology - Aided Instruction in India’ (Karthik Muralidharan, Abhijeet Singh, and Alejandro J. Ganimian) by: Gabriel Heller Sahlgren

3. ‘Is it the Way they Use it? Teachers, ICT and Student Achievement’ (Simona Comi, Gianluca Argentin, Marco Gui, Federica Origo, and Laura Pagani) by: Nick Hassey

4. ‘Logged In and Zoned Out: How Laptop Internet Use Relates to Classroom Learning’ (Susan M. Ravizza, Mitchell G. Uitvlugt, Kimberly M. Fenn) by: Carl Hendrick

5. ‘The Effect of Adaptive versus Static Practicing on Student Learning - Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment’ (Chris van Klaveren, Sebastiaan Vonkb, and Ilja Cornelisz) by: James Croft

6. ‘Measuring Conceptual Understanding Using Comparative Judgement’ (Marie-Josée Bisson, Camilla Gilmore, Matthew Inglis and Ian Jones) by: Daisy Christodoulou

About the authors

John Blake is Head of Education and Social Reform for the think-tank Policy Exchange. Prior to that, he was a senior school leader and history teacher for ten years in a variety of schools in London and Essex.
 
Daisy Christodoulou is the Director of Education at No More Marking, a provider of online comparative judgement. She works closely with schools on developing new approaches to assessment. Before that, she was Head of Assessment at Ark Schools, a network of 35 academy schools. She has taught English in two London comprehensives and has been part of government commissions on the future of teacher training and assessment. Daisy is the author of Seven Myths about Education and Making Good Progress? The Future of Assessment for Learning, as well as an influential blog. You can also find her on Twitter @daisychristo.
 
James Croft is Founder and Executive Director of the Centre for Education Economics (CfEE) and the author and co-author of several of its reports, including Optimising autonomy: a blueprint for education reform (2017) and Taking a lead: how to access the leadership premium (2016) and Collaborative overreach: why collaboration probably isn’t key to the next phase of school reform (2015).
 
Nick Hassey is Associate Director of Research and Evaluation at Teach First where he undertakes long term research projects looking at the key drivers of lower attainment for young people from disadvantaged areas, what changes to government policy are likely to mean for schools, and the communities they serve, and the role of Teach First in addressing the issues these schools and communities face. Previously he worked at PwC and began his career at the polling company ComRes.
 
Carl Hendrick is the head of learning and research at Wellington College where he teaches English. He is also completing a PhD at King’s College London in education. He has taught for several years in both the state and independent sectors where has worked on several cross sectoral collaborations and is a co-director of the Telegraph Festival of Education.
 
Gabriel Heller Sahlgren is Research Director at the Centre for Education Economics (CfEE), affiliated research fellow with the Research Institute of Industrial Economics, and a PhD student at the London School of Economics. He is the author of numerous publications on issues relating to applied microeconomics, including ‘Retirement Blues’ in the Journal of Health Economics and Incentivising Excellence: School Choice and Education Quality (CMRE and IEA 2013). Gabriel is the Editor of CfEE’s Monthly Research Digest.
 
 
 
 
 
You can download the Digest for free hereContributions to the volume include commentary on the following research papers:
 

1. ‘Mobile Phones in the Classroom: Examining the Effects of Texting, Twitter, and Message Content on Student Learning’ (Jeffrey H. Kuznekoff, Stevie Munz, and Scott Titsworth) Commentary by Daisy Christodoulou 

2. ‘Can personality traits and intelligence compensate for background disadvantage? Predicting status attainment in adulthood’ (R. I. Damian, R. Su, M. Shanahan, U. Trautwein and B. W. Roberts) Commentary by Dale Bassett 
 
3. ‘Does Management Matter in Schools?’ (Nicholas Bloom, Renata Lemos, Raffaella Sadun and John Van Reenen) Commentary by Henrik Jordahl 
 
4. ‘An RCT evaluation of the Numeracy and Literacy project’ (Jack Worth, Juliet Sizmur, Rob Ager, and Ben Styles) Commentary by Jack Worth 
 
5. ‘“Variation problems” and their roles in the topic of fraction division in Chinese mathematics textbook examples’ (Xuhua Sun) Commentary by Tim Oates 
 
6. ‘School Vouchers: A Survey of the Economics Literature’ (Dennis Epple, Richard E. Romano, Miguel Urquiola) Commentary by James Croft
 
 
About the authors
 
Dale Bassett is Head of Product Reform at AQA awarding body. Previously at AQA, he was Director of Public Policy, and prior to that Research Director at the think tank Reform, where he led on research into public service reform, specialising in education policy.
 
 
Daisy Christodoulou is the Research and Development Manager at ARK Schools (Absolute Return for Kids). A Teach First graduate, she taught English in two London
comprehensives. She is the author of Seven Myths about Education.
 
James Croft is Executive Director of the Centre for the Study of Market Reform of Education (CMRE) and the author and co-author of several of its reports, including ‘Collaborative overreach: why collaboration probably isn’t key to the next phase of school reform’ (2015).
 
Henrik Jordahl is Associate Professor of Economics at Uppsala University, and Programme Director at the Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN) in Stockholm, where directs the research program ‘The Economics of the Service Sector’.
 
Jack Worth is a Research Manager at the National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER). As part of the NFER Education Trials Unit, he managed the evaluation of the University of Oxford Improving Numeracy and Literacy programme, a large cluster-randomised trial in primary schools. Previously he was Researcher at the Centre for Market and Public Organisation (CMPO).
 
Tim Oates CBE is Group Director of Assessment Research and Development at Cambridge Assessment. He is a member of Ofqual’s Standards Advisory Group and
following the publication of his paper ‘Could do better’, offering a framework for reform, was chair of the Expert Panel for Review of England’s National Curriculum.